← Deep analysesHome
mttssn research · Nordic Deep Dive
Equinor (EQNR.OL)
Energy · Integrated oil & gas, NCS (Equinor) · LTM Q2 2026
Analysis date: 2026-07-22
Price at analysis: $348.80
Method: mttssn_manual_v1
Conviction: MEDIUM
HOLD
Conviction: MEDIUM
Refresh on LTM Q2 2026: the headline improvement (peak ROIC 9.5%, EP +1,127m) is a price-cycle artefact — H1'26 liquids USD 87.9/bbl vs 66.6 a year prior. On a Brent USD 72 mid-cycle deck ROIC is 7.7% and EP −202m at 8% WACC, essentially unchanged vs the prior 7.5%. Cash returns are strong (H1'26 USD 5.1B, ~7% yield) but the price has run ~11% to NOK 348.8. Thesis holds: no margin of safety. HOLD.
Adj. ROIC
7.7%
WACC 8% → spread -0.3pp
Economic Profit
$-202M
Mid-cycle -USD 202m at 8% WACC (ROIC 7.7% vs WACC); LTM-peak +1,127m is a price artefact
FCF Yield
n/a
H1'26 net cash flow before distribution strong at peak; ~USD 5.1B returns part debt-assisted through-cycle
Price / Target
NOK 349 → NOK 330
-5% base; HOLD
Revenue (LTM)
$114.4B
LTM USD 114.4B; H1'26 revenue +14% YoY on cycle-peak liquids/gas prices
EBIT Margin
28.4%
LTM NOI margin 28.4% is cycle-driven; mid-cycle adj EBIT ~24% ex-peak prices
EV / IC
n/a
Enterprise value / invested capital
Net Debt
n/a
Finance debt 28.4B (vs 27.8B end-2025); ARO ~13.6B excluded from IC; leverage stable
Thesis

Equinor remains the dominant NCS operator, USD-reporting, ~67% state-owned, with H1'26 production of 2,239 mboe/d (+6% YoY) on Johan Castberg, Halten East and Verdande ramp-up and ~3% 2026 growth guidance. LTM Q2 2026 optics are strong — adjusted operating income USD 21.3B (+40% YoY H1), reported NOI 32,533m — but H1'26 is a clear cycle PEAK on liquids (USD 87.9/bbl) and gas; the headline LTM-peak adjusted ROIC of 9.5% and EP of +1,127m at 8% WACC do not represent through-cycle economics.

Re-based to a mid-cycle Brent USD 72 deck (implied group liquids ~USD 68.3/bbl), adjusted EBIT is ~27,802m, NOPAT ~5,922m, ROIC 7.7% and EP −202m at 8% WACC — marginally below cost of capital. This mid-cycle 7.7% closely corroborates the prior committed LTM Q1 2026 reading of 7.5% at a lower-price quarter: the underlying structural return is roughly UNCHANGED. The 78% Norwegian petroleum tax leaves NOPAT small against a 76.6B OCI-restored capital base, and Power/Renewables remains an EP drag (H1'26 adjusted −31m).

THESIS-CHECK vs prior (HOLD/MED, base NOK 300): ROIC direction unchanged on a mid-cycle basis (7.5% -> 7.7%), EP still sub-WACC through-cycle; the LTM-peak EP flip to positive is a joint artefact of the price peak and the 8% (vs prior 9%) WACC, NOT a structural re-rating. New: the ~1,509m impairment add-back was corrected upward (H1'26 was a 128m loss, not a reversal), still driven by non-recurring Empire Wind / portfolio-pruning write-downs. The thesis HOLDS — no margin of safety at a mid cycle. Price has risen ~11% to NOK 348.8, widening the reverse-DCF premium; base target revised modestly higher to track price, not fundamentals.

Valuation · reverse-DCF & scenarios

The op frame understates equity economics for a symmetric-tax NCS producer — the 78% levy means the state co-funds capex — but even the friendly framing leaves no margin of safety. On the prior committed read the reverse-DCF fair EV sat ~21-23% below market with implied growth pinned at the model cap; at the higher NOK 348.8 price that premium has widened. Mid-cycle EP is −202m at 8% WACC and only positive at 7% (+563), so intrinsic value does not support the current price without an above-mid-cycle deck.

Base NOK 330 (−5%): the negative mid-cycle EP spread and reverse-DCF premium offset the ~7% annual payout yield over 24 months; revised up from prior NOK 300 purely to track the ~11% higher price, not a fundamental upgrade. Bull NOK 410 (+18%): sustained Brent strength or a European gas shock flows straight through NCS gas leverage while a USD 3B/yr buyback shrinks the count. Bear NOK 240 (−31%): a Brent downcycle converges the price toward the reverse-DCF floor, cushioned by the dividend.

Market-implied growth
≥7.3%
model ceiling — EV implies more than constant-ROIC sustains
No-growth value / share
$-16
-5% of price; rest = priced-in growth
ROIC − WACC
-0.3 pp
ROIC 7.7% vs WACC 8.0% — positive = value creation
CAP (priced-in)
n/a
years of excess returns the price implies (fades to WACC)

At today’s enterprise value the constant-ROIC reverse-DCF maxes out: even at its sustainable-growth ceiling (~7.3%, limited by ROIC 8% ≈ WACC 8%) it cannot reach the current EV. No-growth value is $-16/share (-5% of price); the market prices in growth and/or a higher ROIC than booked — richly valued on this lens. Read the sensitivity grid.

Scenario24m targetImpl. gUpsideProb.Driver
Bull$410≥7%+18%25%Sustained Brent/Euro-gas strength; NCS gas leverage plus USD 3B buyback
Base$330≥7%-5%45%Roughly flat: rDCF premium offset by ~7% payout yield; tracks higher price
Bear$240≥7%-31%30%Brent downcycle; converges toward reverse-DCF floor, dividend cushions
Prob-weighted$323-7%100%Scenario-weighted expected value

Sensitivity — fair value / share at WACC × growth

WACC \ g0%3%5%8%10%15%
6.50%-6-4-3-2-11
7.25%-12-11-11-10-10-10
8.00% (base)-16-16-16-16-16-18
8.75%-19-19-20-21-21-24
9.50%-22-22-23-24-25-29

Green = fair value above the current price of $348.80. The reverse-DCF conclusion is dominated by WACC and growth — see the whole surface, not a single fair value.

Method & data. NOPAT $5,922, invested capital and ROIC 7.7% are observed (adjustments.json); WACC 8.0% and terminal g 2.5% are assumptions. EV→equity uses net debt $113,926. The model holds ROIC constant (no fade) over the explicit horizon; the CAP figure instead fades excess returns to WACC.

⤓ Download the full model (.xlsx) — formula-driven sheets; flex the blue input cells and the model cascades in Excel.

Key drivers

1. NCS gas leverage

Pipeline gas to Europe prices off TTF; any supply disruption flows straight to EBIT.

2. Production growth

H1'26 2,239 mboe/d (+6% YoY); ~3% 2026 guidance on Castberg, Halten East, Verdande.

3. Capital returns

H1'26 USD 5.1B (dividends 1,899 + buybacks 3,299); USD 3B buyback and USD 0.39/sh quarterly dividend for 2026, ~7% of market cap.

4. Portfolio pruning

Argentina/Vaca Muerta exit (+467m gain, Vista shares), Peregrino 20% held-for-sale — capital concentrated on core NCS.

5. Tax symmetry

The 78% NCS levy is symmetric — the state co-funds capex, so equity cash returns exceed what gross mid-cycle ROIC implies.

Key risks
Conclusion

THESIS-CHECK: HOLDS. The refresh to LTM Q2 2026 improves the optics (peak ROIC 9.5%, EP +1,127m at 8% WACC) but this is a price-cycle artefact — on a Brent USD 72 mid-cycle deck ROIC is 7.7% and EP −202m, essentially the prior 7.5% / sub-WACC structural read. The 78% petroleum tax and OCI-restored 76.6B capital base pinch adjusted returns from both ends, and Power remains an EP drag. The impairment add-back is a normalisation, not a red flag. HOLD, medium conviction.

Base NOK 330, revised up from NOK 300 purely to track the ~11% higher NOK 348.8 price — a mechanical adjustment, not a fundamental upgrade (structural mid-cycle economics are unchanged). A Brent-led pullback toward NOK 240-260 would restore a genuine margin of safety against the reverse-DCF floor and make the ~7% payout yield cheap; a European gas-supply shock is the bull path. At NOK 348.8 the market already pays for a full cycle.

Footnote evidence & sources

Every adjustment traces to the cited note/page in the source filing — click to open it there. Annual report / 10-K: 📄 open  ·  Latest interim: 📄 open

Adjustment / figureValueSourceWhy mttssn treats it this way
LTM revenue (Total revenues and other income)114,416Consolidated statement of income (Q2 report) + AR consolidated IS 📄 p.768FY2025 106,462 (AR) + H1 2026 63,020 - H1 2025 55,066 (Q2 report).
LTM net operating income (EBIT base)32,533Consolidated statement of income 📄 p.781FY2025 25,352 + H1 2026 21,776 - H1 2025 14,595.
LTM income tax24,159Consolidated statement of income 📄 p.774FY2025 20,030 + H1 2026 14,833 - H1 2025 10,704; effective ~72.8% pre-tax / 74.3% on NOI (Norwegian petroleum tax).
LTM net income9,051Consolidated statement of income 📄 p.804FY2025 5,058 + H1 2026 7,940 - H1 2025 3,947.
LTM net impairment add-back (pretax)1,509Reconciliation of adjusted operating income — impairment adjusting item (H1'26 +128 MMP, H1'25 +1,101 Power/Empire Wind) + FY2025 AR line 15079 (+2,482) + segment note line 9587 (-2,481) 📄 p.1857FY2025 2,482 (APM) or 2,481 (segment) - H1 2025 1,101/1,100 + H1 2026 128 = 1,509m net impairment LOSS; corrects the streamlined 1,252 (sign error on H1'26). Empire Wind US offshore wind (Power) + E&P Intl/USA portfolio pruning — one-offs.
FY2025 impairment by segment2,481Segment note — Net impairment (losses)/reversals FY2025 📄 p.9587E&P Norway -173, E&P Intl -851, E&P USA -385, MMP +283, Power -1,355 = -2,481; confirms Empire Wind (Power) + portfolio pruning composition.
Company adjusted operating income (APM, LTM)33,663Adjusted operating income* — FY2025 27,591 (AR) + H1'26 21,252 + H1'25 15,180 (Q2 report) 📄 p.1857APM bridge check vs our LTM-peak adj EBIT 34,042 = -1.1% divergence.
Argentina/Vista disposal gain (pre-tax)467Note 3 Acquisitions and disposals — Divestment of onshore assets in Argentina 📄 p.1330Closed 7 May 2026, consideration fair value 1,425m (722 cash + 408 Vista shares + contingent); 467m pre-tax gain in E&P International, reported as Other income. Company strips it in APM; we leave it in EBIT (conservative).
Group average liquids price (H1 2026, USD/bbl)87.9Financial & operational data 📄 p.105Cycle-peak vs 66.6 H1'25; anchors the mid-cycle re-basing. Q2 2026 alone 97.9; average Brent H1'26 92.6 vs 71.7.
Total equity (30 Jun 2026)43,132Consolidated balance sheet 📄 p.848Shareholders' equity 43,063 + NCI 69.
Accumulated OCI stripped (translation + equity-accounted)-8,711Statement of changes in equity, At 30 June 2026 📄 p.893Translation reserve -9,016 + OCI from equity-accounted +305; FX/actuarial not operating capital.
Finance debt (30 Jun 2026)28,401Consolidated balance sheet 📄 p.848Non-current 21,594 + current 6,807 (excl. lease liabilities 4,018).
Cash and cash equivalents (30 Jun 2026)8,062Consolidated balance sheet 📄 p.863Only excess cash (cash - 2% of revenue) subtracted from IC.
Net pension liability (30 Jun 2026)2,082Consolidated balance sheet 📄 p.848Pension liabilities 4,335 - pension assets 2,253.
ARO / decommissioning provisions (31 Dec 2025)13,598Note — Provisions for asset retirement obligations (ARO) 📄 p.11595Large E&P decommissioning provision; excluded from IC; accretion ~605m/yr sits below EBIT (recurring, no add-back).
Analysis history

How the mttssn view has evolved — each prior dated note is preserved.

Quality · Buffett tenets7 / 15
Understandable business
An integrated NCS oil/gas/LNG producer is conceptually simple with a long operating record and clean segment reporting, but the 78% special petroleum tax, ~67% state ownership, a still-loss-making Power segment now a standalone reportable business, and continued portfolio pruning add real complexity to the returns picture.
Durable moat
[kostnads-skalfördel · stabil] Top-quartile unit production cost ambition on a low-cost, long-life NCS base; H1'26 production 2,239 mboe/d (+6% YoY) with dominant pipe-gas infrastructure to Europe. But mid-cycle spread is thin — mid-cycle ROIC ~7.7% ≈ 8% WACC — so returns rest on the resource cost curve, not pricing power; falsifierare: a Brent USD 72 deck already leaves EP marginally negative, and any NCS cost inflation or gas-demand erosion flips the spread negative.
Management & capital allocation
H1'26 shareholder returns USD 5.1B (dividends 1,899 + buybacks 3,299), dividend lifted to USD 0.39/sh, USD 3B buyback for 2026, and disciplined pruning (Argentina/Vaca Muerta exit, +467m gain). Röd flagga: the ~1,509m LTM net impairment led by Empire Wind US offshore-wind (regulatory reversal) alongside continued renewables allocation is contradictory, and through-cycle payouts run ahead of mid-cycle FCF, part debt-assisted (finance debt 28.4B vs 27.8B end-2025).
Financial strength & returns
On a mid-cycle (Brent USD 72) frame adjusted ROIC is 7.7% vs 8% WACC, EP −USD 202m — roughly cost of capital or slightly below; the headline LTM-peak 9.5% ROIC / +1,127m EP is a price-cycle artefact. Balance sheet sound (finance debt 28.4B, net pension 2.1B, large ARO ~13.6B excluded from IC), but the 78% petroleum tax leaves NOPAT small against a 76.6B OCI-restored capital base and Power remains an EP drag.
Valuation margin of safety
Mid-cycle EP is negative at the base 8% WACC and only turns positive at 7%; the reverse-DCF fair EV runs ~21-23% below market on the prior committed read, and the NOK 348.8 price has risen ~11% since the prior note without a structural improvement. The case rests on the ~7% payout yield and symmetric NCS tax, not intrinsic upside.