← Deep analysesHome
mttssn research · Nordic Deep Dive
Wallenius Wilhelmsen (WAWI.OL)
Industrials · RoRo car-carrier shipping & vehicle logistics · LTM Q1 2026
Analysis date: 2026-07-07
Price at analysis: $131.30
Method: mttssn_streamlined_v1
Conviction: MEDIUM
BUY
Conviction: MEDIUM
The market prices Wallenius Wilhelmsen for permanent decline: PEBV 0.46 and implied perpetual growth of −38% against LTM adjusted NOPAT of $1,033M, ROIC 27.5% and EP +$733M. Even haircutting to a ~$650M through-cycle NOPAT, zero-growth value is ~NOK 170 vs the NOK 131.30 price. Cycle-elevated earnings, a cut FY2026 guide and Hormuz/tariff noise cap conviction at medium. BUY.
Adj. ROIC
27.5%
WACC 8% → spread +19.5pp
Economic Profit
+$733M
+$733M on $3.75bn IC; 19.5pp spread — cycle-elevated
FCF Yield
n/a
Null in record; screen FCF-yield percentile 92.3 (Börsdata)
Price / Target
NOK 131 → NOK 170
+29% base; BUY
Revenue (LTM)
$5.2B
LTM $5,196M, −0.8% vs FY2025; Q1 2026 −3.4% yoy
EBIT Margin
23.0%
Adj. EBIT 20.7% LTM — peak-era; guidance implies fade
EV / IC
n/a
Enterprise value / invested capital
Net Debt
n/a
$515M ex-leases, 1.2x adj. EBITDA; EUKOR put $897M outside
Thesis

Wallenius Wilhelmsen is the world's #2 pure car and truck carrier (PCTC) operator — Shipping is 76% of revenue, with landside Logistics and a Government segment on top. LTM Q1 2026 economics are exceptional: $5,196M revenue, 20.7% adjusted EBIT margin, adjusted NOPAT of $1,033M on $3.75bn invested capital for a 27.5% ROIC and +$733M economic profit at an 8% WACC — marginally ahead of peer HAUTO despite a broader divisional structure.

Those numbers are cycle-elevated and the fade has started: FY2026 adj. EBITDA guidance was cut to ~$1.6bn from an implicit ~$1.8bn+, the March 2026 Hormuz closure trapped a vessel and lifted bunker costs that BAF clauses recover only with a 2–4 month lag (Q2 2026 the trough quarter), and USTR port fees plus the EV/China mix shift press volumes structurally. The streamlined record does not quantify contract coverage vs spot or the industry orderbook — the two key cycle variables — so the base case must be conservative.

The asymmetry is in the price, not the earnings: at market EV of $5.3bn the equity capitalizes only ~$425M of perpetual NOPAT at an 8% WACC — a ~59% haircut to LTM and below any plausible mid-cycle run-rate for a balance sheet at 1.2x adj. EBITDA. The reverse-DCF fair EV is $16.0bn at zero growth (NOK 352/share); we do not need that scenario — a heavily normalized ~$650M NOPAT perpetuity still puts value ~30% above the NOK 131.30 price.

Valuation · reverse-DCF & scenarios

Reverse-DCF: market EV $5,335M implies perpetual growth of −38% on current NOPAT; fair EV at zero growth is $16,036M and $17,502M at GDP growth — NOK 352 and NOK 385 per share after bridging $543M net debt at 9.62 NOK/USD across 423.1M shares. PEBV stands at 0.46, i.e. the equity trades at less than half the no-growth economic book value of the existing NOPAT stream. We treat those fair values as ceilings, not targets: LTM NOPAT sits at the top of the freight cycle.

Scenario table uses through-cycle NOPAT perpetuities at g=0. Base NOK 170 (+29%) on ~$650M normalized NOPAT; bull NOK 240 (+83%) if guidance-level economics (~$1.6bn EBITDA, ~$900M NOPAT) prove the sustainable floor; bear NOK 90 (−31%) on a hard down-cycle (~$350M NOPAT) from tariffs, EV mix and newbuild supply. Probability-weighted NOK 168, +28%.

Market-implied growth
≥26.1%
model ceiling — EV implies more than constant-ROIC sustains
No-growth value / share
$-9
-7% of price; rest = priced-in growth
ROIC − WACC
+19.5 pp
ROIC 27.5% vs WACC 8.0% — positive = value creation
CAP (priced-in)
11.1 yrs
years of excess returns the price implies (fades to WACC)

At today’s enterprise value the constant-ROIC reverse-DCF maxes out: even at its sustainable-growth ceiling (~26.1%, limited by ROIC 28% ≈ WACC 8%) it cannot reach the current EV. No-growth value is $-9/share (-7% of price); the market prices in growth and/or a higher ROIC than booked — richly valued on this lens. Read the sensitivity grid.

Scenario24m targetImpl. gUpsideProb.Driver
Bull$240≥26%+83%25%Guidance-level ~$900M NOPAT proves the sustainable floor
Base$170≥26%+29%50%Through-cycle ~$650M NOPAT perpetuity, g=0
Bear$90≥26%-31%25%Hard down-cycle: tariffs + EV mix + newbuild supply, ~$350M NOPAT
Prob-weighted$168+28%100%Scenario-weighted expected value

Sensitivity — fair value / share at WACC × growth

WACC \ g0%3%5%8%10%15%
6.50%41115232843
7.25%-425111527
8.00% (base)-9-5-23616
8.75%-14-10-8-4-17
9.50%-17-14-12-9-61

Green = fair value above the current price of $131.30. The reverse-DCF conclusion is dominated by WACC and growth — see the whole surface, not a single fair value.

Method & data. NOPAT $1,033, invested capital and ROIC 27.5% are observed (adjustments.json); WACC 8.0% and terminal g 2.5% are assumptions. EV→equity uses net debt $20,003. The model holds ROIC constant (no fade) over the explicit horizon; the CAP figure instead fades excess returns to WACC.

⤓ Download the full model (.xlsx) — formula-driven sheets; flex the blue input cells and the model cascades in Excel.

Key drivers

1. Priced-in collapse

Market EV capitalizes ~$425M perpetual NOPAT vs $1,033M LTM; PEBV 0.46 and implied g of −38% — the down-cycle is largely in the price.

2. Best-in-class returns

Adjusted ROIC 27.5% vs 8% WACC, EP +$733M — ahead of HAUTO (25.8%) with a 3.7% effective tax rate under tonnage/participation regimes.

3. Logistics & Government ballast

Landside logistics (21% of revenue) and Government contracts add earnings less exposed to spot freight rates.

4. Balance-sheet headroom

Net debt ex-leases $515M, 1.2x adj. EBITDA — the equity survives a down-cycle without distress mechanics.

5. BAF recovery lag

Bunker adjustment factors recover Hormuz-driven fuel cost with a 2–4 month lag — Q2 2026 is a timing trough, not the run-rate.

Key risks
Conclusion

WAWI is a top-decile value creator (ROIC 27.5%, EP +$733M, sector rank 8/213) trading at 0.46x economic book value with the market pricing perpetual −38% decline. Even our deliberately haircut base — ~$650M through-cycle NOPAT, zero growth — yields NOK 170 (+29%). BUY, medium conviction; the discount is wide enough to absorb substantial normalization.

Conviction is capped at medium by what the record does not show: contract coverage, the orderbook, and the EUKOR put resolution. A full deep-dive quantifying coverage and the FY2026 trough would be the trigger to revisit sizing; sustained guidance misses below ~$1.4bn EBITDA would force a base-case rebuild.

Footnote evidence & sources

Every adjustment traces to the cited note/page in the source filing — click to open it there. Annual report / 10-K: 📄 open

NOPAT adjustments: other_one_off_addback LTM: strip MIRRAT subsidiary disposal gain (FY2025 -135M) + strip vessel disposal gains (FY2025 -28M, Q1 2026 ~0M) + add USTR port fee LTM net (+20M = FY25 21M + Q1'25 0M - Q1'26 1M recovery) + add digital transformation (+18M = FY25 12M + Q1'26 6M) = net -124M → other_one_off = -114M. restructuring_normalization: FY25 4M + Q1'26 2M − Q1'25 0M = +6M... rounding to 5M. sum_pretax -119M computed directly from company APM bridge (LTM adj EBIT 1,076M − LTM reported EBIT 1,194M = -118M ≈ -119M). Stored here as approx split.

Post-tax add-backs: No impairment in LTM. FY2025 goodwill derecognition (MIRRAT 39M) was part of disposal, not standalone impairment.

Company add-backs we reject: PPA amortization 37M/yr (customer relations 31M + other intangibles 6M). Company does not add it back to adjusted EBIT either — consistent. SBC 1M (cash-settled LTIP, immaterial). Both kept in opex per mttssn methodology.

Invested capital: BS from Q1 2026 (31.03.2026). OCI-justering: Currency translation reserve = −43M USD per Statement of Changes in Equity, Dec 31, 2024 (Wallenius Wilhelmsen Annual Report 2024, sida 141). equity_ex_oci = 3,064 − (−43) = 3,107M. Pension remeasurements (−2M 2024) ingår i Retained earnings (ej separat OCI-kolumn). Inga hedge-reserver (WAWI tillämpar fair value hedge → P&L, ej OCI). IB debt: non-current loans+bonds 1,181M + current 224M = 1,405M. Cash 890M. Pension net liability 28M (FY2025 figure). EUKOR written put option 897M excluded. IC = 3,107 + 1,405 + 28 − 786.1 = 3,753.9M. NOTERING: OCI från Dec 31, 2024 används (FY2024 AR); Q1 2026 BS-data men ingen Q1 2026 OCI-tabell tillgänglig. Materialitet: 43/3,064 = 1.4% — över 1%-tröskel, men liten effekt.

Pages read — FY: [5, 6, 7, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 131, 143, 144, 145, 148, 149, 150, 158, 180, 206, 207] · Q: [3, 4, 14, 16, 17, 18, 23, 30, 37, 38, 39]   📄 p.5

Analysis history

How the mttssn view has evolved — each prior dated note is preserved.

Quality · Buffett tenets11 / 15
Understandable business
Transparent three-segment PCTC model (Shipping 76% of revenue, plus Logistics and Government); APM bridge reconciles to our adjusted EBIT at 0.0% divergence — but the $897M EUKOR written put and heavy LTM one-off traffic add complexity.
Durable moat
World #2 PCTC operator: scale, specialized RoRo tonnage, high-and-heavy mix and Government contracts — but a contested duopoly vs HAUTO on a commodity freight core, with EV-transition and newbuild supply capping durability.
Management & capital allocation
Leverage held at 1.2x adj. EBITDA (net debt ex-leases $515M), candid FY2026 guidance cut to ~$1.6bn adj. EBITDA, clean APM disclosure; buyback/dividend track record not covered in the streamlined record.
Financial strength & returns
Adjusted ROIC 27.5% vs 8% WACC (+19.5pp spread), EP +$733M on $3.75bn invested capital, 3.7% effective tax under tonnage/participation regimes — best-in-class value creation, ahead of HAUTO (25.8%).
Valuation margin of safety
PEBV 0.46 and implied perpetual growth of −38%: market EV capitalizes only ~$425M of perpetual NOPAT vs $1,033M LTM — a wide discount even to haircut economics, tempered because LTM is cycle-elevated and guidance is already fading.