← Deep analysesHome
mttssn research · Nordic Deep Dive
Goodtech (GOD.OL)
Industrials · Norwegian industrial automation & water-tech · LTM Q1 2026
Analysis date: 2026-06-07
Price at analysis: NOK 13.00
Method: mttssn_streamlined_v1
Conviction: MEDIUM
HOLD
Conviction: MEDIUM
A now Norway-focused industrial-automation/water-tech engineering group, cleaned up after shedding loss-making Swedish operations. Adjusted ROIC 18% and EP +NOK 20M are genuine but partly mechanical, and goodwill is 56% of equity (single Norwegian CGU, passed IAS 36 at 14.4%). Statistically cheap (PEBV 0.72) but already re-rated and quality-capped. HOLD, medium conviction.
Adj. ROIC
18.0%
WACC 8% → spread +10.0pp
Economic Profit
+NOK 20M
+NOK 20M; genuine but partly mechanical
FCF Yield
19.8%
~20% FCF yield; net cash
Price / Target
NOK 13 → NOK 16
+23% base; HOLD
Revenue (LTM)
NOK 700M
LTM; Norway 87% of revenue
EBIT Margin
6.0%
~5–6% gross EBIT; Q1 EBITA 10.5%
EV / IC
1.41×
Enterprise value / invested capital
Net Debt
n/a
Net cash; zero bank debt
Thesis

Goodtech is effectively a Norway-only industrial-automation and water/environment engineering-services group (87% of revenue) after exiting its loss-making Swedish units. The model is project-driven with structurally low, volatile EBIT margins (~5–6% on gross revenue) and a shallow, relationship-based moat; capital allocation has improved markedly (net cash, zero bank debt, CFO 83 vs EBITDA 67).

The headline 18% adjusted ROIC and +NOK 20M EP are real but partly mechanical — an asset-light denominator after historical write-offs plus a ~NOK 97M excess-cash strip — and goodwill at NOK 155M is 56% of equity in a single cyclical Norwegian CGU (it passed IAS 36 at a stiff 14.4% pre-tax rate with comfortable headroom). Q1 2026 showed margin expansion (EBITA 7.0%→10.5%).

Valuation · reverse-DCF & scenarios

Reverse-DCF base sits ~NOK 23 versus NOK 13 (PEBV 0.72, EV/IC 1.4x, ~20% FCF yield) — statistically cheap, but we haircut heavily for the thin-margin/shallow-moat profile and the goodwill overhang.

Base NOK 16 on continued margin recovery; bull NOK 22 if Q1 margin expansion sustains and the order book stabilises; bear NOK 11 if Norwegian industrial capex softens and project margins compress.

Market-implied growth
-21.9%
NOPAT CAGR over 5y the EV already requires
No-growth value / share
NOK 21
165% of price; rest = priced-in growth
ROIC − WACC
+10.0 pp
ROIC 18.0% vs WACC 8.0% — positive = value creation
CAP (priced-in)
0.0 yrs
years of excess returns the price implies (fades to WACC)

The market pays today’s enterprise value for roughly -21.9% NOPAT growth over 5 years. The business earns 18% on capital against a 8% cost of capital (spread +10.0 pp); the no-growth value is NOK 21/share (165% of price), so the rest is priced-in growth.

Scenario24m targetImpl. gUpsideProb.Driver
BullNOK 22+1%+69%30%Q1 margin expansion sustains; backlog stabilises
BaseNOK 16-12%+23%45%Continued margin recovery; cyclical project base
BearNOK 11-30%-15%25%Norwegian capex softens; project margins compress
Prob-weightedNOK 17+27%100%Scenario-weighted expected value

Sensitivity — fair value / share at WACC × growth

WACC \ g0%3%5%8%10%15%
6.50%283032353743
7.25%242628303236
8.00% (base)212324262731
8.75%192122232427
9.50%181920212224

Green = fair value above the current price of NOK 13.00. The reverse-DCF conclusion is dominated by WACC and growth — see the whole surface, not a single fair value.

Method & data. NOPAT NOK 36, invested capital and ROIC 18.0% are observed (adjustments.json); WACC 8.0% and terminal g 2.5% are assumptions. EV→equity uses net debt NOK -111. The model holds ROIC constant (no fade) over the explicit horizon; the CAP figure instead fades excess returns to WACC.

⤓ Download the full model (.xlsx) — formula-driven sheets; flex the blue input cells and the model cascades in Excel.

Key drivers

1. Margin recovery

Q1 2026 EBITA 7.0%→10.5% (+54% YoY) — the key signal that the cleanup is working.

2. Net cash + cash conversion

Zero bank debt, CFO 83 vs EBITDA 67, ~20% FCF yield — downside support.

3. Swedish cleanup

Decisive exit of the insolvent Swedish unit removes a structural drag.

4. Above-WACC returns

Adjusted ROIC 18% > 8% WACC, EP +NOK 20M — genuine, if partly mechanical.

Key risks
Conclusion

Goodtech is a cleaned-up, net-cash, above-WACC Norwegian engineering group that screens cheap (PEBV 0.72) but has already re-rated to its analyst target, with a shallow moat and a heavy single-CGU goodwill load capping the multiple. HOLD, medium conviction; base NOK 16.

An upgrade needs the Q1 margin expansion to hold and the order book to stabilise; a backlog deterioration that narrows goodwill headroom is the main downside.

Footnote evidence & sources

Every adjustment traces to the cited note/page in the source filing — click to open it there. Annual report / 10-K: 📄 open  ·  Latest interim: 📄 open

Adjustment / figureValueSourceWhy mttssn treats it this way
Total revenue (FY2025)724Note 3 Operating segments (Total column: Operating revenue 721.2 + Other revenue 2.8) 📄 p.60Group total revenue for FY2025; matches the Borsdata anchor 724.0. Operating revenue 721.2 plus other revenue 2.8.
Total revenue (Q1 2026 / Q1 2025)172Condensed Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss (Q1 2026 172.2; Q1 2025 196.0) 📄 p.13Used to build LTM revenue: 724.0 + 172.2 - 196.0 = 700.2.
EBIT (FY2025)36.6Note 3 segment / Statement of Profit or Loss (EBITDA 67.3, D&A -27.0, Impairment -3.7, EBIT 36.6) 📄 p.60Reported group EBIT FY2025; matches anchor. Confirms a -3.7 impairment line inside EBIT.
EBIT (Q1 2026 / Q1 2025)14.2Statement of Profit or Loss (Q1 2026 EBIT 14.2; Q1 2025 EBIT 9.0) 📄 p.13LTM EBIT = 36.6 + 14.2 - 9.0 = 41.8. Shows the +58% YoY EBIT improvement.
Impairment in EBIT (FY2025)3.7Note 14 Intangible Assets (Impairment for the year on Development costs -3.7) + narrative 📄 p.72Impairment of capitalized development costs (~MNOK 2.0 MES tied to divested Goodtech Solutions AB, ~1.0 Wize 2 internal tool). Genuine one-off; normalized out (pre-tax add-back +3.7).
Goodwill carrying amount155Note 14 Intangible Assets, 'Distribution of Goodwill' (Goodtech AS 154.8) and carrying-amount reconciliation p72 📄 p.73Goodwill = NOK 154.8m, ALL in CGU Norway (2024: 154.4). The BS 'Intangible assets' 167.1 = goodwill 154.8 + capitalized development costs 12.8. Goodwill/equity = 56%.
Goodwill impairment-test discount rate0.144Note 14, 'Testing for Impairment of CGUs Involving Goodwill' (Discount rate before tax / WACC, CGU Norway = 14.4%) 📄 p.73IAS 36 value-in-use pre-tax discount rate for the single Norway CGU. Test PASSED with comfortable headroom; no quantitative sensitivity disclosed because no reasonably possible change triggers impairment (p74). Not used as group WACC.
Goodwill impairment in FY20250Note 14 'Impairment of Goodwill' — 'no impairment situations have been identified for the CGU Norway as of 31 December 2025' 📄 p.74Zero goodwill impairment in FY2025. (The NOK 5.1m goodwill impairment on Goodtech Solutions AB was a 2024 event tied to its sale completed Feb 2025; outside the LTM window.)
PPA amortization0Note 14 reconciliation (no acquisition-intangible/'other intangible' amortization; goodwill not amortized) 📄 p.72No PPA amortization to reject — the 'other intangible assets' column is ~0; only internal-development amortization exists, which we keep in opex but is not PPA.
Share-based compensation (FY2025)1.9Statement of Changes in Equity, 'Share-based compensation' line (2025: 1.9) 📄 p.54SBC 1.9 MNOK kept in opex (mttssn does not add back). Real economic cost.
Lease liabilities (Q1 2026)61.5Statement of Financial Position (Non-current lease liabilities 45.0 + Current lease liabilities 16.5) 📄 p.15Total lease liabilities 61.5 (Q1 2026). EXCLUDED from IC (office/facility leases peripheral to a services model). FY2025 figure was 63.0 (AR p52: 45.6 + 17.4).
Interest-bearing debt ex-lease (Q1 2026 & FY2025)0Statement of Financial Position ('Current interest-bearing debt' = 0); corroborated by Note 20 (AR p80) 📄 p.15Zero bank/overdraft debt. Note 20 (AR p80) states all interest-bearing liabilities relate solely to recognized lease liabilities; the SEK 13.7 + EUR 3.8 = 17.5 Nordea overdraft at FY2024 was fully repaid (cash flow 'Change in overdraft currency -17.5').
Cash and cash equivalents (Q1 2026)111Statement of Financial Position, Cash and cash equivalents 📄 p.15Q1 2026 cash 110.8 (FY2025 was 127.0, AR p52). Excess cash 96.8 stripped from IC after 2%-of-revenue operational allowance.
Total equity (Q1 2026)294Statement of Financial Position, Total equity 📄 p.15Q1 2026 total equity 293.8 (FY2025 277.0, AR p52/p54). Forms equity_ex_oci (OCI immaterial). NCI = 0.
Accumulated OCI / translation reserve (FY2025)0.1Statement of Changes in Equity, Translation differences column (31.12.2025 = 0.1) 📄 p.54Translation reserve only NOK 0.1m at year-end; <1% of equity -> set accumulated_oci = 0 (not stripped). No hedge/pension OCI reserves.
Net financial items (FY2025)-3Note 9 Finance Income and Finance Expense (income 7.0, expense -10.3; -3.3 in note, -3.0 in segment) 📄 p.65Interest on loans/operating credit/lease obligations -3.6; FX losses -5.8; guarantee commission -0.3. Confirms minimal financing cost and lease interest already below EBIT.
Tax expense (FY2025) / statutory rate3.8Note 10 Taxes (Tax expense 3.8 on EBT 33.6; tax at 22% statutory = 7.4) 📄 p.66Reported effective rate ~11.3% distorted by recognition of DTAs on NOK 122.0m carryforward losses. We normalize NOPAT on the 22% Norway statutory rate.
Net income / continuing-ops profit (FY2025)29.8Statement of Comprehensive Income (Continuing operations 29.8; Discontinued -17.8; total earnings after tax 18.9) 📄 p.51Headline 'Profit for the year 29.8' = continuing operations. Total net income (incl. discontinued) 18.9. LTM net income (incl. discontinued) = 18.9 + 10.7 - (-2.6) = 32.2.
EBITA APM (FY2025)43.6Key figures (EBITA 43.6, EBITA margin 8.4%) 📄 p.3Company headline APM. EBITA LTM = 43.6 + 14.8 - 9.6 = 48.8, used as company_adjusted_ebit in the APM bridge (6.8% divergence vs our 45.5).
Operating cash flow & capex (FY2025)83.1Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (CFO 83.1; capex tangible -3.5, intangible -2.8) 📄 p.55Strong cash conversion; FCF proxy = 83.1 - 6.3 = 76.8. Also shows loss on disposal of discontinued operations 9.0 and lease principal repayment -21.0.
Order backlog (Q1 2026)312Order intake and backlog (backlog 312 MNOK; order intake 148 MNOK) 📄 p.4Backlog down from 333 (Q4 2025); frame-agreement renewals, less project-heavy mix. Forward-demand context for the qualitative view.
Share price end-20259.78Remuneration/Shareholders section ('shares were listed at NOK 9.78 per share', vs 9.96 end-2024) 📄 p.85Reference point; the stock has since re-rated to NOK 13.00 (Jun 2026) on the margin improvement.
Analysis history

How the mttssn view has evolved — each prior dated note is preserved.

Quality · Buffett tenets8 / 15
Understandable business
Norwegian industrial-automation + water/environment engineering services; project-based, legible but lumpy after exiting the loss-making Swedish unit.
Durable moat
Shallow: relationship/frame-agreement based with modest switching costs; low, volatile project margins (~5–6% on gross revenue) and limited pricing power.
Able & honest management
Improved capital allocation: net cash, zero bank debt, strong cash conversion (CFO 83 vs EBITDA 67), and a decisive cleanup of the insolvent Swedish operations.
Financial strength
Adjusted ROIC 18% > 8% WACC, EP +NOK 20M — but partly mechanical (asset-light denominator after write-offs + a large excess-cash strip); goodwill is 56% of equity.
Margin of safety
Reverse-DCF looks cheap (~NOK 23) but the stock already re-rated NOK 8→13 to the analyst target; the thin-margin/shallow-moat profile caps the multiple.