← Deep analysesHome
mttssn research · Nordic Deep Dive
GRK Infra (GRK.HE)
Civil engineering · Nordic infra contractor · LTM Q1 2026
Analysis date: 2026-07-24
Price at analysis: €18.72
Method: mttssn_streamlined_v1
Conviction: MEDIUM
HOLD
Conviction: MEDIUM
Finnish civil-engineering / rail / paving contractor (FI 48%, SE 40%, EE 12%) on a record EUR 883m backlog and net-cash balance sheet (EUR -234m net debt, 54% equity ratio). Through-cycle adj EBIT margin ~6% is the whole thesis; ROIC/EP degenerate on negative invested capital and are not usable quality signals. At ~9.6x EV/adj-EBIT off a demonstrated margin peak, priced fairly, not cheap. HOLD.
Adj. ROIC
-101.0%
WACC 8% → spread -109.0pp
Economic Profit
+€49M
EP EUR +48.9m is DEGENERATE: negative invested capital (-44.8m) makes the WACC capital charge negative; not a usable value-creation signal (company flags ROCE 'not meaningful').
FCF Yield
n/a
LTM operating FCF EUR 79.5m but volatile with contract cycle (Q1 2026 -12.5m on working-capital swing); FY2025 operating FCF EUR 138m.
Price / Target
€19 → €19
+1% base; HOLD
Revenue (LTM)
€810M
LTM revenue EUR 809.8m; 2026 guidance EUR 720-870m off a 546-to-872m 2023-25 ramp; Q1 -35.9% YoY on Stegra wind-down and seasonality.
EBIT Margin
6.3%
Adj EBIT margin ~6.8% LTM; multi-year 4.6% (2023) to 6.3% (2024) to 6.7% (2025); >6% through-cycle target, cycle-high not structural spread.
EV / IC
n/a
Enterprise value / invested capital
Net Debt
n/a
Net debt EUR -234m (net cash); cash + investments EUR 269.8m vs debt+leases 35.8m; equity ratio 54.2%; EUR 21.7m dividend paid 2026.
Thesis

Contracting economics: revenue EUR 546m to 872m (2023-25) on a rising adj EBIT margin (4.6% to 6.7%) with negative net working capital funding growth internally. Judge quality on the margin and backlog, not ROIC/EP which are mechanically degenerate on structurally negative invested capital (-44.8m) as the company itself flags.

Cyclical, low-moat civil engineering: public-infra single-buyer tenders, cost-index clauses hedge bitumen but competition commoditises pricing. The 6.7% margin is a cycle-high, not a durable structural spread; the >6% through-cycle target is aspirational for the sector.

Record EUR 883m backlog (+22% QoQ) plus ~EUR 400m pipeline optionality (Turku tramway, Rail Baltica, Luleaa port) give forward visibility, weighted to Sweden — the strategic growth market — but Stegra project wind-down and Q1 revenue -35.9% YoY show the lumpiness.

Valuation · reverse-DCF & scenarios

EV EUR 533m against LTM adj EBIT 55.4m is ~9.6x (~9.2x on FY2025 58.2m); 2026 guidance adj EBIT 45-60m brackets the LTM print, so the multiple re-rates to ~9-12x on the guide midpoint. Fair for a cyclical contractor at a margin peak, not a value entry.

Net cash EUR 234m (EV 30% below market cap 767m) is real downside support and unusual for the sector; but ROIC/EP cannot underwrite an intrinsic-value case here, so the margin of safety rests on the balance sheet and backlog rather than a modelled discount.

Reverse-DCF panel unavailable: non-positive ic.

Scenario24m targetUpsideProb.Driver
Bull€26+39%25%Backlog + ~EUR 400m optionality convert, Sweden scales, margin holds >6.7%; re-rate to ~12x EV/adj-EBIT on EUR 60m guide-high.
Base€19+1%50%Through-cycle adj EBIT ~55m at ~9.6x EV/adj-EBIT, backlog steady; net cash supports fair-value hold near current price.
Bear€13-31%25%Cycle rolls, margin mean-reverts toward 5% and a large fixed-price contract slips; de-rate despite net-cash cushion.
Prob-weighted€19+3%100%Scenario-weighted expected value
Key drivers

1. Backlog conversion

Record EUR 883m backlog + ~EUR 400m optionality convert into 2026-27 revenue

2. Sweden expansion

Norrbotniabanan / Luleaa wins scale the strategic 40% Sweden leg

3. Margin discipline

Holding >6% adj EBIT margin through-cycle validates the quality thesis

4. Net-cash optionality

EUR 234m liquidity funds M&A or buybacks without dilution

5. Cost-index hedging

Contract clauses pass bitumen/oil inflation to public clients

Key risks
Conclusion

HOLD. A well-run, net-cash Nordic contractor on a record backlog, but a cyclical, low-moat business priced fairly (~9.6x EV/adj-EBIT) at a demonstrated margin peak. The quality case leans on the balance sheet and through-cycle margin target, not on returns-on-capital, which are degenerate on negative invested capital.

Re-rate to BUY on a durable break above the 6% through-cycle margin with backlog conversion in Sweden, or a pullback that puts EV/adj-EBIT toward mid-cycle earnings at a clear discount. Trim into any thesis-breaking large-contract loss.

Footnote evidence & sources

Every adjustment traces to the cited note/page in the source filing — click to open it there. Annual report / 10-K: 📄 open  ·  Latest interim: 📄 open

Adjustment / figureValueSourceWhy mttssn treats it this way
Revenue (LTM Q1 2026)810Consolidated statement of comprehensive income / p.19 📄 p.19LTM = FY2025 872.311 - Q1_2025 174.470 + Q1_2026 111.917. Q1 revenue -35.9% YoY off an exceptionally strong prior-year comparison; full-year guidance EUR 720-870m.
Operating profit / EBIT (LTM)51.365Consolidated statement of comprehensive income / p.19 📄 p.19LTM = FY2025 53.506 - Q1_2025 8.051 + Q1_2026 5.910.
Items affecting comparability (FY2025)4.696Reconciliation of alternative performance measures / p.21 📄 p.21Disposal gains/losses 2.896 + listing costs 1.319 + restructuring 0.298 + acquisition transaction costs 0.182; genuine IPO-window one-offs, normalized out of NOPAT.
Company adjusted EBIT (FY2025)58.201Adjusted EBIT reconciliation / p.21 📄 p.21APM sanity anchor: reported EBIT 53.506 + comparability 4.696 = 58.201; our bridge matches exactly on FY basis.
Total equity (31 Mar 2026)174Consolidated balance sheet / p.20 📄 p.20All attributable to parent; no NCI. Reduced from 190.142 at YE by EUR 21.7m dividend.
Cash + current investments (31 Mar 2026)270Consolidated balance sheet / p.20 📄 p.20Cash 234.548 + current investments 35.218 = liquid assets driving deeply negative net debt (-233.4m) and negative invested capital.
Interest-bearing debt + leases (31 Mar 2026)35.778Consolidated balance sheet / p.20 📄 p.20Borrowings 14.876+7.986=22.862 plus lease liabilities 7.618+5.298=12.916.
Contract liabilities (31 Mar 2026)177Consolidated balance sheet / p.20 📄 p.20Customer advances / POC over-billings fund operations → negative net working capital (-156.8m) → negative invested capital; ROIC/EP not meaningful.
Order backlog (31 Mar 2026)883Summary / p.3 📄 p.3Record all-time high, +22% vs year-end; forward-revenue visibility, strong in Sweden (strategic expansion market).
Intangible assets / goodwill (FY2025)2.464Note 12 Intangible assets / p.132 📄 p.132Total intangibles 2.464 incl goodwill 1.048 — negligible; no PPA amortisation stream to reject, no material impairment (only 0.213m write-down).
Quality · Buffett tenets9 / 15
Understandable business
Civil-engineering / paving / rail contractor across Finland (48%), Sweden (40%), Estonia (12%); revenue EUR 546m (2023) to 872m (2025), one-page economics. Cyclical, project-lumpy, IPO-window one-offs (EUR 4.7m FY2025) add noise, hence 2 not 3.
Durable moat
[kostnads-skalfördel · stabil] adj EBIT margin 4.6% (2023) to 6.3% (2024) to 6.7% (2025), >6% through-cycle target; mid-cycle spread positive but commoditised tendering, single-buyer public infra, no switching cost. Emerging niche scale, not structural. Falsifier: a repricing/loss on a large fixed-price contract (Stegra) collapses margin below the 6% target.
Able & honest management
[allokering · candor] APM divergence 4.8% (clean, PASS); EUR 21.7m dividend paid, EPS 1.07, no dilution; explicitly refuses growth at the expense of margin. Röd flagga: fresh 2024 IPO, short public capital-allocation track record; watch M&A discipline as Sweden expands.
Financial strength
Net cash EUR -234m, equity ratio 54.2%, negligible goodwill (1.0m). ROIC/EP degenerate on negative IC (-44.8m) so not scored as spread; balance sheet clearly survives a bad year, but returns-on-capital signal is unusable, capping at 2.
Margin of safety
EV EUR 533m / LTM adj EBIT 55.4m ~9.6x (9.2x on FY2025 58.2m); backlog EUR 883m record. Reasonable not cheap for a cyclical at a demonstrated margin peak; net-cash cushions downside. No deep discount to conservative through-cycle value.