← Deep analysesHome
mttssn research · Nordic Deep Dive
Alior Bank SA (ALR.WA)
Financials · Polish universal bank (Alior) · LTM Q1 2026
Analysis date: 2026-07-18
Price at analysis: PLN 141.60
Method: mttssn_streamlined_v1
Conviction: MEDIUM
BUY
Conviction: MEDIUM
Alior is a Polish universal bank earning ROE 17.5% / ROTE 18.3% — a ~7pp spread over a ~10.5% cost of equity — funded by a granular low-cost deposit base (deposits PLN 85.4bn, +8.9% YoY) with CET1 17.85% and 42.1% cost/income. Asset quality is improving (NPL 5.39% from 6.69%). Yet the equity trades at 1.47x TBV and 8.1x P/E versus a Gordon-justified ~2.0x. Value creation at a discount, tempered by PZU/State control. BUY, medium conviction.
Return on Equity
17.5%
Cost of equity ~9.5%
Price / Book
0.00×
Market cap / equity
Fair P/B (Gordon)
2.23×
(ROE−g)/(COE−g); g 3%
Price / Target
PLN 142 → PLN 165
+17% base; BUY
Price / Earnings
0.0×
Market cap / net income
P / TBV
0.00×
Price / tangible book
Economic Profit
n/a
ROE 17.5% (ROTE 18.3%) vs ~10.5% cost of equity — a ~7pp positive spread (economic_profit null by fin design)
Equity (book)
PLN 13,132.7B
Total shareholders' equity
Thesis

Alior is a mid-sized Polish universal bank — net interest income (LTM PLN 5,098m) plus fees (PLN 918m), funded by PLN 85.4bn of granular customer deposits (+8.9% YoY) against a PLN 104.7bn balance sheet. LTM net profit PLN 2,294m; the model is simple and deposit-funded, with the FX-mortgage legal-risk provision the main distortion.

Returns are strong for the frame: ROE 17.5% / ROTE 18.3% sits ~7pp above a ~10.5% cost of equity, underpinned by a best-in-peer 42.1% cost/income and a low-cost deposit franchise. Capital is fortress-grade (CET1/Tier 1 17.85%, ~635bp over the 11.5% requirement) and asset quality is improving — NPL down to 5.39% from 6.69% YoY with 51.45% coverage.

On the ROE/P-B frame the equity is cheap: 1.47x TBV and 8.1x P/E against a Gordon-justified ~2.0x P/TBV. The Q1 2026 profit dip (-15.4% YoY) is a CIT-tax effect, not operating deterioration — gross profit was near-flat. The discount, not the quality, is the swing factor; the offset is PZU/State-Treasury indirect control.

Valuation · residual income (equity frame) & scenarios

Gordon fair P/TBV ≈ (ROTE 18.3% − g 4%)/(Kₑ 10.5% − g 4%) ≈ 2.0x, versus the current 1.47x — a ~27% discount even before crediting the improving credit book. P/E 8.1x is undemanding in absolute terms; the gap is a re-rating opportunity, not a value trap, provided the ROE spread holds.

Base PLN 165 (+17%) as ROE holds mid-teens and the discount partly closes toward Gordon-fair; bull PLN 200 (spread persists, NPL keeps improving, policy overhang eases with a fuller payout); bear PLN 110 (Polish CoR/NPL turn or FX-mortgage provisioning escalates, compressing ROE toward Kₑ).

Residual-income panel unavailable: non-positive book equity.

Scenario24m targetUpsideProb.Driver
BullPLN 200+41%30%Spread persists, NPL keeps improving, policy overhang eases with fuller payout
BasePLN 165+17%45%ROE holds mid-teens; discount partly closes toward Gordon-fair ~2.0x TBV
BearPLN 110-22%25%Polish CoR/NPL turn or FX-mortgage provisioning compresses ROE toward Kₑ
Prob-weightedPLN 162+14%100%Scenario-weighted expected value
Key drivers

1. Low-cost deposit franchise

Granular retail deposits PLN 85.4bn (+8.9% YoY), ~82% deposit/asset, holding a wide NII spread.

2. High return spread

ROE 17.5% / ROTE 18.3% vs ~10.5% cost of equity — a ~7pp positive residual-income spread.

3. Fortress capital

CET1/Tier 1 17.85% (~635bp over the 11.5% requirement) supports both resilience and payout capacity.

4. Improving asset quality

NPL down to 5.39% from 6.69% YoY, coverage 51.45%, CoR 0.67% — credit trend improving, not deteriorating.

5. Best-in-peer efficiency

Cost/income 42.1% — lean cost base amplifies the spread as the loan book (mortgages +84% YoY) grows.

Key risks
Conclusion

Alior is a well-capitalised Polish universal bank earning a wide ~7pp ROE spread over its cost of equity on a low-cost deposit franchise, with improving asset quality — yet it trades at just 1.47x TBV and 8.1x P/E against a Gordon-justified ~2.0x. Genuine value creation at a real discount. BUY, medium conviction; base target PLN 165 (+17%).

The discount, not the quality, is the thesis; the checks on conviction are the PZU/State-Treasury overhang and FX-mortgage provisioning. A payout that reflects the fortress CET1, or continued NPL improvement, would support a re-rating; a credit or rate turn compressing the spread is the principal downside.

Footnote evidence & sources

Every adjustment traces to the cited note/page in the source filing — click to open it there. Annual report / 10-K: 📄 open  ·  Latest interim: 📄 open

Adjustment / figureValueSourceWhy mttssn treats it this way
Net profit (Q1 2026, 3M)403,186Interim consolidated income statement / p.5 📄 p.5Latest-quarter net profit; feeds LTM = FY2025 - Q1 2025 + Q1 2026.
Net profit (Q1 2025, 3M comparative)476,314Interim consolidated income statement / p.5 📄 p.5Prior-year quarter subtracted in the LTM roll-forward.
Net profit (FY2025 anchor)2,367,048Consolidated income statement / p.4 📄 p.4FY anchor for LTM net income; all attributable to parent (no NCI).
Net interest income (FY2025)5,134,891Consolidated income statement / p.4 📄 p.4Core bank revenue line; combined with fees into LTM revenue.
Net interest income (Q1 2026, 3M)1,248,230Interim consolidated income statement / p.5 📄 p.5Latest-quarter NII, down 2.8% YoY on lower rates; feeds LTM NII 5,098,341.
Total equity (31.03.2026)13,132,716Consolidated statement of financial position / p.5 📄 p.5Latest interim equity used as the stock for ROE/ROTE and P/BV; no non-controlling interests.
Intangible assets incl. goodwill (31.03.2026)560,963Note 34 Tangible fixed assets and intangible assets / p.56 📄 p.56Subtracted from equity for tangible equity (ROTE, P/TBV); goodwill only 976 of the 560,963.
TCR / Tier 1 (CET1 proxy, 31.03.2026)0.178Selected financial indicators / p.3 📄 p.3No AT1 in own funds, so CET1 = Tier 1 = TCR = 17.85%; ~635bps above the 11.50% requirement.
Cost/income, NPL, NPL coverage (31.03.2026)0.421Selected financial indicators / p.3 📄 p.3C/I 42.1%, NPL 5.39% (down from 6.69% YoY), NPL coverage 51.45% — quality improving.
Quality · Buffett tenets12 / 15
Understandable business
Universal Polish deposit-and-credit bank — NII (LTM PLN 5,098m) + fees (PLN 918m), deposit-funded, PLN 104.7bn balance sheet. Simple, legible model with a long earnings history; the FX-mortgage legal-risk provision is the one moving part.
Durable moat
[kostnads-skalfördel · stabil] Granular low-cost retail deposit franchise funds the book: customer deposits PLN 85.4bn, +8.9% YoY, against PLN 104.7bn assets — a ~82% deposit/asset ratio that holds a wide NII spread and a 42.1% cost/income. frame: ROE-Ke, spread ~+7pp (ROE 17.5% vs ~10.5% Ke). falsifierare: deposit-cost inflation from rate competition or a Polish CoR/NPL turn compressing the spread below Ke.
Management & capital allocation
[allokering · candor] LTM ROE 17.5% on retained capital while lifting CET1/TCR to 17.85% (~635bp over the 11.5% requirement); NPL down to 5.39% from 6.69% YoY, coverage 51.45% — asset quality actively improved. rod flagga: PZU/State-Treasury indirect control (PZU 31.9%) can subordinate minority capital-return to policy priorities; FX-mortgage provisioning cadence.
Financial strength & returns
ROE 17.5% / ROTE 18.3% vs ~10.5% cost of equity — a ~7pp positive spread; CET1/Tier 1 17.85% (~635bp buffer), C/I 42.1%, NPL 5.39% / 51.45% coverage. Strong, well-capitalised returns for the frame (economic_profit null by fin design).
Valuation margin of safety
1.47x TBV / 1.41x book and 8.1x P/E against a Gordon-justified ~2.0x P/TBV on ROTE 18.3%, Ke 10.5%, g 4% — trades at a meaningful discount to fair, giving a real margin of safety despite the policy-ownership overhang.